Subjective, objective realities, sopAdhika, nirupAdhika bhramas


In Vicharasagara, while describing the various sattAs, vyAvahArika is differentiated from prAtibhAsika by Sadhu Nischaladasa ji by describing them so: ब्रह्मज्ञानमनन्तराबाध्यत्वं व्यावहारिकत्वम् and ब्रह्मज्ञानेतरबाध्यत्वं प्रातिभासिकत्वम्। That is, the former cannot be sublated or negated without brahmajnAna whereas the latter can be negated by something other than brahmajnAna. In the case of the world, it is vyAvahArika because it cannot be sublated without brahmajnAna, whereas other delusions of rope-snake, nacre-silver, mirage-water, redness of the crystal, etc, are negated on the rise of knowledge of their locus, on which they are superimposed. The world has objective reality as created by Ishvara whereas the bhrAnti-viShayas are jIva-sRShTa.

The snake doesn't continue to appear when known as rope, nor does the silver appear when known as the shell. Then, why is it that the mirage-water still continues to appear, and why does the crystal still appear red, even after the knowledge regarding the real nature of the desert and the crystal? The former two examples are of nirupAdhika bhramas, wherein there is no upAdhi needed other than avidyA as kAraNa to produce kArya. The rope appears as a snake due to avidyA. When that avidyA is countered by vidyA, it ceasing, its kArya ceases to be as well. The same is true with respect to the nacre-silver example. However, in the case of mirage-water, which continues to appear even after knowing the desert as the locus on which the mirage water makes its illusive appearance, there is an additional upAdhi and thus, the bhrama caused is sopAdhika. It is no longer subjective as others see them too. The Ishvara-niyati due to which the refraction takes place continues to be there. The mirage water continues to appear as long as the desert exists in the set conditions, both of the latter are vyAvahArika, while the former is not vyAvahArika and is not pramA.

It can be seen better in the second example of the redness of the crystal. The plain crystal, appearing red due to the upAdhi of the red flower placed near it, continues to appear red as long as the red flower continues to remain in its vicinity. The red flower is vyAvahArika, but its tainting the crystal red, as though, is prAtibhAsika. The red flower appears to all as a red flower since it is vyAvahArika but the redness of the crystal, even if it is prAtibhAsika, is objective, not subjective. It is still a bhrAnti. It still doesn't go away after jnAna of the plain crystal. Why?! Should it be considered as pramA, valid knowledge, then? It can't be so, since such knowledge isn't valid. Having moved the red flower away from the crystal, no one sees the crystal as red. For something to be pramA, it should pramANa-janya. This is bhrama and is explained in the shAstras as not cognised by the pramAtR through antaHkaraNa-vRtti but it is witnessed by the sAkShi through avidyA-vRtti. अप्रमाज्ञानं न मनोवृत्तिरूपं किन्त्वविद्यावृत्तिरूपं साक्ष्याश्रयम्। Thereby, it is not valid, not pramA, but a bhrama and that too of the sopAdhika kind, wherein the pratiti will continue as long as Ishvara-sRShTa japAkusuma remains in the proximity of the crystal, but it won't continue to delude a person who knows it so. Similarly, extending this to the final exemplified, one having brahmajnAna continues to have pratiti of the IshvarasRShTa jagat but he is not bhrAnta any more.


On a related note: The TippaNakAra of Vicharasagara, Swami Vasudeva Brahmendra Sarasvati ji, explains by saying that although there is niyati that the rope appears only as a snake, etc, and not as silver, etc, even in the case of bhrAnti, there is no similarity needed between both rope and snake really! The dRShTAnta countering such expectancy of similarity is that the sky appears as having a dome shape, or as coloured blue, without any similarity between the sky and dome shape or the blue colour! Then how is to be explained? The explanation given is more in keeping with the main siddhAnta of Vedanta which is DSV/ EJV, where Bhagavan Karikakara Gaudapadacharya explains that the vAsanAs have always been so and being anAdi, rope has been seen as snake and not as silver, and therefore, one continues to do so across janmas, just like one keeps seeing the sky as shaped like a dome or coloured blue. So too, the world appears as the world, with all its rules being followed meticulously, because they have been so all the time across janmas. Those saMskAras continue to manifest even this janma.


गुरुपादुकाभ्याम्



Vicharasagara class announcement

Namaste everyone.

We will be beginning an online study of Vicharasagara of Sadhu Nischaladasa, translated into Sanskrit by Swami Vasudeva Brahmendra Sarasvati  on Google Meet from 23rd June 2020 daily, except Thu and prathamA tithi 06:00-06:45 am IST in English. Those who have some background in Vedanta, decent knowhow of Sanskrit, are interested in serious study and able to attend daily may kindly let me know as a comment here with their Whatsapp number (I'll not publish your number here, I'll get in an email).

gurupAdukAbhyAm
Praveen R. Bhat

Tattvabodha 01

॥श्रीगुरुभ्यो नमः॥

Tattvabodha is the most basic text of Vedanta to be studied by whoseover is interested to enter into Vedanta. These are recordings from the classes I had conducted after finishing the crash course in Sanskrit.


Crash-course in Sanskrit part 3



Mundakopanishad with bhAShya



श्रीगुरुभ्यो नमः। Namaste.
(This may be forwarded as felt appropriate till 15th April 2020)

मुण्डकोपनिषद्भाष्य will be taught यथाशक्ति online via FreeConferenceCall or Zoom in Kannada-Havigannada and maybe some English mix by Praveen R. Bhat, from 1130-1230hrs IST daily, except Thursday and maybe some other days, starting this Friday, 17th April 2020. The course is free; donations are welcome, but only from gRhasthas or those earning.

From prior experiences, following are the strict eligibilty criteria:
--First and foremost, ability to attend the live pATha daily at given timings with saucha, not via recordings and without multitasking!
--Average Sanskrit knowhow and, obviously, Kannada with some dialect mix with an interest in mokSha-shAstra that is not academic.
--nityasandhyA at least once; in the case of a woman, if married, the husband or if unmarried, the father should be doing nityasandhyA. In other words, "I am spiritual, not religious" requests will be ignored. :-)
--shraddhA in the shruti and advaita-sampradAya.
--Studied at least basic Vedanta such as tattvabodha/ vedAntasAra from the sampradAya. Self-learning through books doesn't count.

Those interested may kindly send their request to join the pATha with their full name and responding to all the above terms by mentioning how they are placed w.r.t. each of the five terms in the comment with their email id or Whatsapp phone number.

PS: Adding your gotra, vedashAkhA and pravara would be beneficial.

धन्योस्मि। गुरुपादुकाभ्याम्।

Crash-course in Sanskrit part 1



Sanskrit tuitions



After much thought and ignoring suggestions, finally I started teaching Sanskrit for tuition. Sanskrit is neither something that masses care to learn, much less pay for it. Although I don't feel good that I have to charge for to teach Sanskrit vyAkarana which is a vedAMga, its Apaddharma for me now! I advertised at two places and got a couple of students:

Some of my earlier or current Sanskrit and/ or Vedanta students have been kind enough to leave me a review on the former. Many thanks to them, though its exaggerated. :-)

I'll also start posting recordings of my classes and completed courses here with an irritating request to donate. :-)

gurupAdukAbhyAm