- Its continuous; any continuity need be expressed more than once.
- It indicates that the I he talks of as Self is not the I we know as ego.
- It shows that the I lives with other (perceived) I's around.
- It expresses that the nirguna I and saguna I go hand-in-hand.
- It means that the I is advaitic, even while living in dvaita.
- It voices that this I is that I.
- Its the living expression of tat tvam asi.
This is a blog by a person who doesn't know who he is, what he does, why he does what he does, or what he doesn't do and why he doesn't do what he doesn't do! I think you get the drift... if you still decide to stay on, welcome; else, so long. :) Thanks!
I, I
Ramana's "Who am I?" enquiry process is expected to end in *I, I* for everyone. Here's where my understanding led me yesterday on why its called as *I, I* against just *I*:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Bhatta,
As I've already mentioned to you, the idea that struck me about I I while in Premier bookshop was awesome:
Ramana says that the Spiritual Heart is the centre of consciousness and similar to the Physical Heart's rhythm, the I I is the rhythm of the Spiritual Heart!!!
ramaNArpaNamstu.
Post a Comment